“Vienna, Austria: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) have limited treatment options and there are few oncologists who are specialised in this relatively rare disease. But now results from a multi-centre randomised international trial of an innovative treatment show a marked improvement in the length of time patients with mid-gut NETs live without the disease getting worse (progression-free survival, or PFS), researchers will report to the 2015 European Cancer Congress today.
“Professor Philippe Ruszniewski, MD, Head of the Department of Gastroenterology-Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France, who is also a Professor at Paris Diderot University, will tell the Congress that results of the NETTER-1 phase III trial of 177Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera) show a PFS that has never been shown before in this type of cancer. “Because these patients have a real unmet medical need, this is particularly pleasing for us,” he says.
“Lutathera is a member of the family of novel treatments called Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRTs) which involve targeting tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogue (SSA) peptides. The technique belongs to the larger family of molecular nuclear medicine, where trace amounts of active substances, or radiopharmaceuticals, are used to create images and to treat various diseases including cancer. SSAs are widely used in gastrointestinal NETs cancer to reduce symptoms such as diarrhoea.”
“For patients with KRAS wild-type untreated colorectal cancer, adding cetuximab or bevacizumab to combination chemotherapy offers equivalent survival, researchers said at the ESMO 16th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer in Barcelona.” ‘The CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial was designed and formulated in 2005, and the rationale was simple: we had new drugs —bevacizumab and cetuximab— and the study was designed to determine if one was better than the other in first-line for patients with colon cancer,’ said lead study author Alan P. Venook, distinguished Professor of Medical Oncology and Translational Research at the University of California, San Francisco, USA.
“The CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial studied patients whose tumours were KRAS wild-type at codons 12 and 13. Patients received mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI at the discretion of their doctor and were randomised to cetuximab (578 patients) or bevacizumab (559 patients).
” ‘There was no meaningful difference in outcome between treatment arms,’ said Venook. ‘In both arms patients lived close to 30 months. About 10% of patients lived more than 5 years. Overall patients did much better than anticipated and it was indifferent to the type of treatment.’ ”
Editor’s note: This story discusses the results of a clinical trial that tested a treatment for colorectal cancer in volunteer patients without mutations in the KRAS gene in their tumors (as detected by molecular testing). The goal of the trial was to compare two chemotherapy drugs—bevacizumab and cetuximab—to see whether one is better than the other as a first-line colorectal cancer for so-called “KRAS wild-type” colorectal cancer. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the two.