“Young women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer may be more likely to remain fertile if they also receive hormonal treatment, according to new research presented to the 2015 European Cancer Congress on Monday and published simultaneously in Annals of Oncology.
“Researchers will tell the Congress that the addition of treatment with a so-called luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue, or LHRHa, during chemotherapy, could protect women’s ovaries. The approach may increase the chances of pregnancy after breast cancer treatment.
“Dr Matteo Lambertini, MD, a medical oncologist at the IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy, will say: ‘Chemotherapy can damage the ovaries and push young women into the menopause. They may experience infertility, sleep disturbance, sexual dysfunction and osteoporosis. It is psychologically distressing, harmful to health, and affects the treatment decisions of many young women.’
” ‘We found that temporary suppression of ovarian function with LHRHa significantly reduces the risk of premature ovarian failure (POF) caused by chemotherapy. It also seems to be associated with a higher pregnancy rate in young breast cancer patients.’ “
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) constitute only about 3% to 5% of all pancreatic cancers. Compared to the most common pancreatic cancer—adenocarcinoma (aka exocrine tumors), PNETs have a longer disease course and better prognosis; the 5-year survival rate is 42% for PNETs, but only about 5% to 6% for adenocarcinomas. When PNETs are localized, they can usually be removed by surgery. However, PNETs tend to metastasize, most often to the liver, and present a formidable treatment challenge at this stage. Continue reading…
“Patients who received hormonal regimens for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer experienced a significant increase in incidence of and relative risk for cardiovascular toxicity, according to results of a meta-analysis.
“Roberto Iacovelli, MD, medical oncologist in the division of urogenital and head and neck tumors at European Institute of Oncology in Milan, and colleagues sought to define the incidence and RR of cardiovascular events in a population of patients treated with new hormonal therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
“Incidence of all-grade toxicities (grades 1-4) and high-grade toxicities (grade 3-4) served as the primary outcome of the study.
“Iacovelli and colleagues identified six prospective phase 2 or phase 3 studies that included a total of 7,830 patients. Within each study, researchers considered treatment with a novel hormonal agent plus prednisone in the experimental arm (n = 4,520) and placebo plus prednisone (n = 3,310) as the control.”
“More U.S. physicians are sparing their low-risk prostate cancer patients from surgery, radiation and hormone therapy in favor of monitoring their patients over time — a strategy called watchful waiting, a new study shows.
“The number of low-risk patients who didn’t undergo treatment jumped from as low as 7 percent from 1990-2009 to 40 percent from 2010-2013, the study revealed. These findings indicate that more patients are being monitored to see if their conditions get worse.
“This is ‘excellent news’ about the popularity of ‘active surveillance,’ said study author Dr. Matthew Cooperberg, the Helen Diller Family Chair in Urology at the University of California, San Francisco.
” ‘We expected to see a rise in surveillance rates, but were surprised by the steepness of the trajectory,’ he said. ‘This really does represent a paradigm change, and it’s faster than the typical pace of medical evolution.’ “
“Men with advanced prostate cancer who have the androgen receptor splice variant-7 respond to chemotherapy equally as well as those who do not have the variant, according to findings from a small clinical trial.
“Further, taxane chemotherapy may be more effective than hormone therapy for men with the androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7).
” ‘The key finding from this study is that men with detectable AR-V7 in their circulating tumor cells may respond more favorably to chemotherapy (docetaxel or cabazitaxel [Jevtana, Sanofi]) compared to novel hormonal therapies (abiraterone and enzalutamide),’ Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, MBBCh, assistant professor of oncology and assistant professor of urology at the Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, told HemOnc Today. ‘This finding was quite a relief because AR-V7–positive prostate cancer can be very lethal, and now we have at least one class of drugs that may work for these patients.’ ”
“Mounting evidence supports the addition of docetaxel to standard hormone and radiation treatment in men with high-risk prostate cancer. This latest comes from a federally funded phase 3 clinical trial presented here at this year’s American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting.
“The 4-year overall survival rates were higher with docetaxel than standard therapy. The add-on chemotherapy was given for 18 weeks, starting a month after radiation.
” ‘This finding could improve outcomes for thousands of men,’ lead investigator Howard Sandler, MD, from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, said in a statement issued in advance of the news conference on the study. ‘We also expect to see an even bigger survival advantage over time,’ he said.”
“A Phase III trial of Pfizer Inc’s Ibrance showed that, in combination with hormone therapy, the drug more than doubled the duration of disease control for women with the most common type of breast cancer.
“At the time of an interim analysis, patients given Ibrance and AstraZeneca Plc’s Faslodex (fulvestrant), a widely used treatment to block estrogen, lived an average of 9.2 months before their cancer worsened. This compared with 3.8 months for patients treated with Faslodex and a placebo.
“The trial, presented in Chicago at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, enrolled 521 patients whose breast cancer was classified as estrogen-receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative. This category accounts for about 75 percent of all breast cancers.
“Ibrance, or palbociclib, was given conditional approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in February for such patients, but only those who had not previously been treated for advanced breast cancer.”
“Women with luminal A subtype breast cancer – and particularly those older than 60 – may not need radiation treatment if they are already taking hormone therapy, shows clinical research led by radiation oncologists at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre published online today in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
“The findings potentially advance delivery of personalized cancer medicine for up to 25% of women diagnosed with breast cancer in North America every year, say co-principal investigators Dr. Fei-Fei Liu, Chief, Radiation Medicine, and Dr. Anthony Fyles, staff radiation oncologist. Dr. Liu is Chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, where Dr. Fyles is also a Professor. In Ontario alone, they estimate, this could save the provincial health care system up to $3 million annually. Drs. Liu and Fyles talk about their research at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrl5-1gsoSg .
“They stress, however: ‘For all other breast cancer subtypes, radiation therapy is definitely of benefit and the required treatment.’
Drs. Liu and Fyles examined tumour specimens from participants in a prior randomized clinical trial who received either tamoxifen (hormone therapy) plus whole-breast radiation therapy, or only tamoxifen.”
“Nearly 15 million people are living after a cancer diagnosis in the United States. This number represent over 4 percent of the population, an astonishing figure. And a growing one, as reported last year by the ACS and outlined by the NCI’s Office of Cancer Survivorship.
“As cancer patients survive longer they face additional health problems. Radiation to the chest, chemotherapy, antibody therapy and hormone changes can affect blood vessels and heart function in the short term and long, during treatment or years later. But millions affected – and their physicians – remain insufficiently mindful about the risk of heart disease.
“It’s the kind of problem a person who’s had cancer, or a doctor who’s prescribed generally helpful treatment, may not want to think about.
“Years ago, heart complications of cancer treatment didn’t garner so much attention says, Dr. Javid Moslehi, a cardiologist who leads a program in cardio-oncology at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, TN. The emerging field involves cardiologists, oncologists, scientists and others who study the long-term effects of cancer treatment on the heart.”