“For women with the most common type of breast cancer, a new way to analyze magnetic resonance images (MRI) data appears to reliably distinguish between patients who would need only hormonal treatment and those who also need chemotherapy, researchers from Case Western Reserve University report.
“The analysis may provide women diagnosed with estrogen positive-receptor (ER-positive) breast cancer answers far faster than current tests and, due to its expected low cost, open the door to this kind of testing worldwide.
“The research is published in the journal Nature Scientific Reports.”
“Genomic Health, Inc. (Nasdaq: GHDX) today announced results from a study led by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) showing a broad distribution of Oncotype DX® Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) results among prostate MRI findings, suggesting that these two technologies may provide non-overlapping clinical information in men with localized prostate cancer.
” ‘For the first time, we looked at the association between information provided by a genomic assay and a prostate MRI to better understand the value these two technologies bring to clinical practice,’ said Michael Leapman, M.D., lead investigator from UCSF. ‘These new data show that, in some patients, further risk stratification may be possible, and tools such as GPS may add important biological information to more precisely assess the aggressiveness of a patient’s cancer.’
“In this study, researchers conducted a retrospective evaluation of the statistical association between the Oncotype DX GPS results and contributing gene groups with baseline endorectal MRI in 100 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. The results showed a large variation of GPS results across MRI findings, demonstrating that Oncotype DX and MRI offer non-overlapping clinical insights in patients with early-stage prostate cancer.”
“Biopsy guided by a fusion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) improves detection of aggressive prostate cancer compared with mapping or targeting alone and systematic 12-core biopsy.
“Among the first 1,000 men to undergo MRI-fusion biopsy of the prostate at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), the presence of a grade 5 region of interest on fusion biopsy was the strongest predictor of high-grade prostate cancer. ‘Patients who had a grade 5 lesion compared to those who had no suspicious lesions had 23 times the odds of having Gleason ≥7 cancer,’ said Christopher Filson, MD, at UCLA.
“In a separate series of men presenting for prostate biopsy at New York University (NYU), MRI-targeted biopsy increased the detection of Gleason ≥7 prostate cancer by 23% compared with systematic biopsy while decreasing the detection of Gleason 6 disease by 26%.
“Initial results from the Göteborg randomised screening trial indicates that using MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) alongside conventional prostate cancer screening seems to offer improved cancer detection and can help avoid unnecessary biopsies.
“Prostate cancer is the third most common male cancer in Europe, accounting for over 92,000 deaths in 2012 (9% of male deaths). Screening for prostate cancer is a controversial issue, with until recently, little clear evidence that existing screening procedures, using PSA (to be followed by biopsies), were effective. In general, either the screening has tended to miss many cancers, or to give false positives, meaning that many men are subject to invasive testing and perhaps treatment which was just not necessary.
“The Göteborg Trial is the Swedish arm of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), which is the largest randomized prostate cancer screening trial in the world. In 2014 results from this trial showed a significant mortality reduction with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for men aged 55-69 years of age. Now new work, presented at the European Association of Urology Conference in Madrid, shows that using MRI may further improve the accuracy of prostate cancer screening. This research has been awarded the EAU’s First Prize for the Best Abstract by a Resident.”
“In a single-center study reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Riedl et al found that screening with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had greater sensitivity for detection of breast cancer in high-risk women vs mammography or ultrasound irrespective of age, mutation status, or breast density. The addition of mammography or ultrasound added little to the sensitivity of MRI.
“In the study, BRCA mutation carriers and women with a high familial risk (> 20% lifetime risk) for breast cancer were offered screening with mammography, ultrasound, and MRI every 12 months at the Medical University of Vienna. Overall, 559 women with 1,365 complete imaging rounds were included in the analyses. There were 204 suspicious findings (15%). Of these, 38 (19%) were malignant; two additional cancers were found during the study period, including one identified by patient-requested biopsy and one interval cancer…
“The investigators concluded: ‘MRI allows early detection of familial breast cancer regardless of patient age, breast density, or risk status. The added value of mammography is limited, and there is no added value of ultrasound in women undergoing MRI for screening.’ ”
“If results of a prostate-specific antigen test or digital rectal exam are positive, the next port of call is normally a prostate biopsy to confirm whether cancer is present. In a new study published in JAMA, researchers claim a targeted biopsy method is much more accurate in detecting high-risk prostate cancers than the standard biopsy technique.
“The standard method of prostate biopsy, also referred to as a core needle biopsy, involves a doctor removing samples of tissue from the prostate using a thin, hollow needle. The samples are then sent to a pathologist who views them under a microscope and assesses them for cell abnormalities that indicate cancer.
“But the research team, led by Dr. Mohammad Minhaj Siddiqui of the University of Maryland School of Medicine – who was a fellow at the National Institutes of Health at the time of study – says the technique used in their study involves a combination of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which they say can effectively differentiate high-risk prostate cancers from those that are low risk.
” ‘There is a concern that we overdiagnose and overtreat low-risk cancers that are unlikely to be terminal, and this technology enables us to make a more reliable diagnosis than the current standard practice,’ says Dr. Siddiqui.”
“The addition of MRI to mammography significantly improved screening sensitivity among women who harbored BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, according to study results.
“The sensitivity of the screening combination also was comparable among women aged older than 50 years and those aged younger than 50 years, results showed.
“Xuan-Anh Phi, PhD, of University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands, and colleagues pooled individual patient data from six screening trials of high-risk individuals.
“The trials comprised a combined 1,951 women with BRCA1/2 mutations. The median age of the entire population was 41 years; 16.9% were aged 50 to 59 years and 5.5% were aged 60 years or older.
“Of the breast cancers detected, 141 occurred in women aged younger than 50 years, and 43 occurred in women aged 50 years or older.
“MRI detected 78.8% of the cancers, and mammography detected 38.6%. The combination of MRI and mammography detected 88.6% of the cancers and was associated with a significant improvement in screening sensitivity compared with mammography alone (93.4% vs. 39.6%; P˂.001). However, the combination of both screening methods was associated with a reduced specificity compared with mammography alone (80.3% vs. 93.6%; P=.0016).”
In 2007, Steven Keating got his brain scanned for fun. “I volunteered for a study,” says Steven, who was then a student at Queen’s University in Canada. “I wanted to help science, and I was curious about seeing my brain.”
He saw more than anticipated—the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a dime-sized abnormality in his left frontal lobe. But the researchers couldn’t tell what it was, and he had no adverse symptoms. “They said ‘don’t worry, keep an eye on it,'” Steven, who is now a Mechanical Engineering graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab, recalls. A follow-up scan in 2010 wasn’t worrisome either. Continue reading…
“The latest advancement in prostate cancer detection is magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy, which offers benefits for both patient and physician.
“The only place in the Southeast offering the MRI-US image fusion technique is at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Program for Personalized Prostate Cancer Care.
“It is estimated that 2014 will see more than 240,000 new cases of prostate cancer, and more than 29,000 deaths from the disease, according to the National Cancer Institute.
“Jeffrey Nix, M.D., along with colleague Soroush Rais-Bahrami, M.D., both assistant professors in the UAB Department of Urology, studied the MRI-US image fusion as fellows at the NCI. Nix and Rais-Bahrami are two of a select few urologists in the United States trained to utilize this technology; together they have five years’ experience using this approach.
“Nix and Rais-Bahrami say this new technology offers a ttargeted biopsy,’ which refers to direct tissue sampling of suspicious areas seen on MRI as opposed to the traditional method of random, systematic sampling that is essentially performed ‘blindly’ in different ‘ZIP code’ regions of the prostate.”