“The German Breast Group (GBG) presented two analyses that can serve as predictors of response to treatment by further subdividing preoperative (neoadjuvant) patients with HER 2 positive breast cancer and those with triple negative breast cancer based on tumor DNA repair capabilities and related factors.
“Prof. Dr. Gunter von Minckwitz, president of the GBG Research Institute, noted, ‘Taken together these studies demonstrate that a deeper understanding of the variations among breast cancer types that go beyond hormone response and BRCA gene mutations can inform treatment options with increased precision.’
“One study (Abstract No: 1004) fromlead author Dr. von Minckwitz found cancer-related BRCA mutations in the tumor are more common (30.3%) than inherited BRCA mutations (19.8%) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The homologous recombination (HR) assay measures DNA repair capacity beyond those related to BRCA mutation. HR deficiency defined as having either a BRCA mutation of the tumor or a high HR score was found in 70.5% of the patients. These findings can affect treatment options. Patients with a tumor BRCA mutation and/or a high HR score showed a high complete response to preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. Our findings suggest those patients are also benefiting more from the additional use of carboplatin than tumors without HR deficiency.”
“Immunomedics, Inc., (IMMU) today announced that among 49 patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) evaluated for response to treatments with sacituzumab govitecan in a mid-stage clinical study, 31%, or 15 patients, showed a reduction in tumor size of 30% or more. They include 2 patients with complete response. Response assessments were based on the rules set by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Adding the 22 patients with responses between less than 30% tumor shrinkage and less than 20% tumor increase, the disease control rate was 76%.
“Sacituzumab govitecan also produced significant duration of response in these responding patients. Measured as the time it takes from the beginning of sacituzumab govitecan treatments to when the cancer progresses, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for the 48 patients who received the optimal doses of 8 or 10 mg/kg was 6.0 months. Importantly, 63% of patients (22 of 35) had a time-to-progression longer than their last therapy, notwithstanding disease progression has not yet happened in 56% of patients at the time of analysis.
“These results were presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology by Dr. Aditya Bardia of Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston, MA, and a faculty member at Harvard Medical School, who commented, ‘Given that a majority of the patients enrolled into this study had failed 4 or more prior cancer therapies, some as many as 11, we are quite encouraged with sacituzumab govitecan in this late-stage setting in an aggressive disease that is difficult to treat.’ “
“Generex Biotechnology Corporation (www.generex.com) (OTCQB: GNBT) announced today that updated data from the on-going Phase II clinical trial of the AE37 breast cancer vaccine under development at the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Antigen Express, Inc. (www.antigenexpress.com), will be presented at the upcoming annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The current analysis was performed on data that was examined one year after the last patient was enrolled into the trial. The ASCO meeting will be held from May 29 to June 2, 2015 in Chicago, IL.
“The abstract, entitled ‘Final Pre-specified Analysis of the Phase II Trial of the AE37+GM-CSF Vaccine in High Risk Breast Cancer Patients to Prevent Recurrence”, by Julia Greene, et al will be presented on May 30 during the Breast Cancer – HER2/ER session. The study reports on the anticipated five year disease free survival in patients enrolled in a controlled, randomized, and single-blinded Phase II trial that completed enrollment in January of 2014. A prior interim analysis conducted in 2011, as well as a primary efficacy analysis conducted in 2013, pointed to a benefit of the AE37 vaccine in patients not receiving Herceptin and, in particular, patients with triple negative breast cancer. This latter group represents a patient population of high unmet need. The present study continues to show a trend in this population, with a 35% reduction in the relative risk of recurrence in patients receiving the AE37 vaccine.”
“A combination treatment composed of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the investigational PI3K inhibitor BKM120 demonstrated activity and safety for women with triple-negative breast cancer or high-grade serous ovarian cancer, according to study findings presented at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting.
“High-grade serous ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer are similar in that they often have germline BRCA mutations, have a sensitivity to platinum agents and have high copy number alterations based on The Cancer Genome Atlas, according to study background. Further, preclinical data have suggested olaparib (Lynparza, AstraZeneca) is synergistic with BKM120 (Novartis) and BYL719 (Novartis) in both cancers.
“Ursula A. Matulonis, MD, medical director of gynecologic oncology at the Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and associate professor of medicine at Harvard University Medical School, and colleagues evaluated olaparib plus BKM120 in 12 patients with triple-negative breast cancer and 34 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Thirty-five patients had germline BRCA mutations.
“ ‘This is one area where we in ovarian cancer are in the forefront,’ Matulonis said during a press conference. ‘We are using an FDA-approved biomarker through germline BRCA status to basically say when a patient is eligible to receive olaparib.’ “
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine | Apr 23, 2015
“No approved targeted therapies exist to treat triple-negative breast cancer, but new chemotherapeutic treatment strategies are helping shrink tumors so that less breast tissue needs to be removed during surgery. New research led by Brigham and Women’s Hospital in collaboration with the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center finds that breast-conserving therapy – or the removal of less breast tissue via a lumpectomy – was successful in more than 90 percent of the women who became eligible for this procedure after treatment with chemotherapy. Despite these findings, 31 percent who were eligible for breast conserving therapy chose to have the entire breast removed via mastectomy.
“The complete manuscript of this study and its presentation at the American Surgical Association’s 135th annual meeting today in San Diego, California, is anticipated to be published in the Annals of Surgery pending editorial review.
“ ‘We’ve shown that we can offer breast-conserving therapy to more women using these drug combinations, and if they convert, we’re really successful,’ said senior author David Ollila, MD, James and Jesse Millis Distinguished Professor of Surgery at University of North Carolina School of Medicine, co-director of the UNC Breast Program and a member of the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. ‘We have more and more women eligible for breast preservation, and still we saw more than 30 percent of women choosing mastectomy.’ “
“Combination treatment with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib plus the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor BKM120 resulted in clinical activity in women with triple-negative breast cancer and those with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
“Patients that had BRCA-mutant and BRCA wild-type tumors responded to the treatment.
“The results of this phase I trial were presented at a press briefing at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting, held April 18 to 22 in Philadelphia.”
“Early data in a preliminary human study show that an experimental immune system drug is generally safe and well tolerated in women with metastatic, triple-negative breast cancer, a persistently difficult form of the disease to treat.
“Results of the early-phase clinical trial of the therapy, called MPDL3280A, which aims to restore the immune system’s ability to recognize and attack cancer cells, are expected to be presented at the American Association for Cancer Research’s 2015 Annual Meeting in Philadelphia from April 18-22. Triple-negative breast cancer cells lack expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 protein, the established targets for breast cancer therapies.
“The small study was conducted on 54 patients treated at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center and several other institutions.
” ‘Early data in this trial show that the drug is generally safe and well-tolerated, and it appears to be able to control disease in some of these patients,’ says Leisha Emens, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of oncology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. ‘Now we’ll need to test it further in more patients and compare it with standard therapies to establish its therapeutic value.’ “
“Roche Holding AG will skip a mid-stage study of an experimental immunotherapy for breast cancer and proceed directly to a phase 3 trial later this year.
“The Swiss company will study MPDL3280A for triple-negative breast cancer, which is currently treated mostly with chemotherapy, spokeswoman Holli Dickson said in a phone interview. The drug will be tested in combination with chemotherapy.
“The company will present results from an early-stage study of the drug at a cancer meeting in Philadelphia on April 20. Roche is competing with Merck & Co. to develop a drug for a segment of the breast cancer market that may reach as much as $5 billion in peak sales, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. analysts.”
“Cisplatin plus gemcitabine demonstrated superior PFS outcomes compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, according to results of a randomized phase 3 study.
“ ‘Despite general improvements in the management of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer represents a continuing challenge because, when compared with other subtypes, it is associated with a higher frequency of recurrence, shorter DFS and poor OS, despite similar therapeutic approaches to other breast cancers,’ Xi-Chun Hu, MD, of the department of medical oncology at the Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, and colleagues wrote. ‘The median distant disease-free interval for relapsed triple-negative breast cancer is about 1 to 2 years and the median survival for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer is about 1 year.’
“Hu and colleagues evaluated data from 236 patients (median age, 47 years) from 12 institutions or hospitals within the Chinese Breast Cancer Study Group. Patients had not undergone previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease and they had an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1.
“Researchers randomly assigned patients 1:1 to a chemotherapy regimen of 1,250 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 plus 75 mg/m2 cisplatin or 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel on day 1 for eight 3-week cycles.”